Suyog is fighting a cause for the theft of his property.
Its his creativity which is stolen very blatantly by some one else who is supposed to be creative in their work. While this issue goes on, there seem to be an another one of same nature by the same people with Shankar's picture.
I have sent an EMail to them but the EMail addresses which were published on their web site couldnt accept that
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at yahoo.com.I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.<
info@workaholiks.com>:66.98.190.95 does not like recipient.Remote host said: 550-"The recipient cannot be verified. Please check all recipients of this550 message to verify they are valid."Giving up on 66.98.190.95.<
services@workaholiks.com>:66.98.190.95 does not like recipient.Remote host said: 550-"The recipient cannot be verified. Please check all recipients of this550 message to verify they are valid."Giving up on 66.98.190.95.--- Below this line is a copy of the message.Return-Path: <
sriturl@yahoo.com>Received: (qmail 23432 invoked by uid 60001); 9 Dec 2005 10:02:54 -0000DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=gavFAcWum+bk6QV3jp1r+6efHwJPWfyvbWGLfKOcTu/PM4vMykFONgp8TrwvZ/PblrnnDr2eBPjPdoOpx86zE3ZClHOKshEZlqIP76mF6uuslMsHhozGSbUsO47Y59LYrDGWqA2iZMnaptoFHvcDpFbly7CGwqx/kAjCXc3DpFE= ;Message-ID: <
20051209100254.23430.qmail@web54007.mail.yahoo.com>Received: from [61.95.164.75] by web54007.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 02:02:54 PSTDate: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 02:02:54 -0800 (PST)From: Srikanth Turlapati <
sriturl@yahoo.com>Subject: Copyright violationTo:
services@workaholiks.com,
info@workaholiks.comMIME-Version: 1.0Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bitHello,I came to know about the copyright violation by yourcompany in using a photograph of Suyog without theconsent or knowledge of the photographer. This is aserious act, and very unfortunate that people involvedin creative business like you also indulge in suchthings.Being involved in business like advertising whichitself need to be creative, you should be able tounderstand the seriousness of such violation.regards,Srikanth Turlapati